Kamlesh Paswan and others vs State of Bihar — 302/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),74,76,79,352,351(2),303(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRPA200009492026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
872/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
302/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Danapur
Judge
6-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kamlesh Paswan and others
Adv. Nand Kishor Sharma
Ram Anuj Paswan
Navlesh Paswan
Sulekha Devi
Ranju Devi
Sushila Devi
Guddu paswan
Sonu Kumar
Ganeshi Paswan
Hiramani Devi
Kusum Devi
Chanpatiya Devi
Rani Kumari
Sharda Devi
Baleshwar Prasad
Surendra Paswan
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 23-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 17-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 11-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted anticipatory bail to 16 accused persons on the condition that they execute an undertaking not to commit further offenses and furnish two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each within 30 days, with bail to be granted upon their surrender or arrest under CrPC Section 438(2). The court found that while Section 303(2) IPC charges are non-bailable, the remaining charges are bailable, and no prior bail applications were filed in district or high court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court granted anticipatory bail to 16 accused persons on the condition that they execute an undertaking not to commit further offenses and furnish two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each within 30 days, with bail to be granted upon their surrender or arrest under CrPC Section 438(2). The court found that while Section 303(2) IPC charges are non-bailable, the remaining charges are bailable, and no prior bail applications were filed in district or high court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts