Navneet Singh vs State of Bihar — 198/2026

Case under Arms Act Section 25(1-b)(a),26,27,35. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA200005502026

Filing Number

517/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

198/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Danapur

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1571

Police Station

DANAPUR

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 25(1-b)(a),26,27,35
Indian Penal Code Section 302,120(b),34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Navneet Singh

    Adv. Narendra Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

    Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Navneet Singh's anticipatory bail petition in connection with the murder of undertrial prisoner Abhishek Singh in police custody. The court found that the charges are serious (IPC §302, 120B/34 and Arms Act violations), confessional statements of co-accused directly implicate the petitioner in a conspiracy to commit murder by hired shooters, and similar bail applications of other co-accused were previously rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  7. 24-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 198/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Navneet Singh's anticipatory bail petition in connection with the murder of undertrial prisoner Abhishek Singh in police custody. The court found that the charges are serious (IPC §302, 120B/34 and Arms Act violations), confessional statements of co-accused directly implicate the petitioner in a conspiracy to commit murder by hired shooters, and similar bail applications of other co-accused were previously rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case