Ratan Chaudhary vs State of Bihar — 100/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),109,352,351(2),351(3),3(5),103(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 17th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRPA200004882026
Filing Number
456/2026
Filing Date
21-Jan-2026
Registration No
100/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Danapur
Judge
2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- VII
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
111
Police Station
RANIA TALAB
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ratan Chaudhary
Adv. Jitendra Prasad
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Copy of Order
The court rejected the bail petition of Ratan Chaudhary, who is accused of assaulting the informant's father-in-law Gopal Paswan with bamboo sticks and iron rods, causing serious head injuries that resulted in death. The court found the allegations serious based on inquest and postmortem reports, witness statements, and the fact that a similarly situated co-accused's bail was already rejected, making continued detention appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- VII
-
07-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- VII
-
26-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- VII
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- VII
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- VII
-
19-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- VII
-
06-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- VII
-
24-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- VII
-
22-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 100/2026
The court rejected the bail petition of Ratan Chaudhary, who is accused of assaulting the informant's father-in-law Gopal Paswan with bamboo sticks and iron rods, causing serious head injuries that resulted in death. The court found the allegations serious based on inquest and postmortem reports, witness statements, and the fact that a similarly situated co-accused's bail was already rejected, making continued detention appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts