Sanjit Kumar vs State of Bihar — 158/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),351(2),352. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA200004082026

Filing Number

381/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

158/2026

Registration Date

20-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Danapur

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

641

Police Station

NAUBATPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),351(2),352

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sanjit Kumar

    Adv. Anil Kumar 1

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Sanjeet Kumar, who was accused of fraudulently withdrawing Rs. 7 lakhs from his grandmother's bank account using a false UPI ID created with his mobile number. The court found the anticipatory bail petition unmaintainable; however, it directed that if the petitioner surrenders within four weeks, the lower court may consider granting regular bail based on available materials without prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  7. 21-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 158/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Sanjeet Kumar, who was accused of fraudulently withdrawing Rs. 7 lakhs from his grandmother's bank account using a false UPI ID created with his mobile number. The court found the anticipatory bail petition unmaintainable; however, it directed that if the petitioner surrenders within four weeks, the lower court may consider granting regular bail based on available materials without prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case