Baban Saw and others vs State of Bihar — 144/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,308,379,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA200003682026

Filing Number

341/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

144/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Danapur

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,308,379,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Baban Saw and others

    Adv. Shio Murti Singh

  2. 2.Munna Kumar

  3. 3.Nitish Kumar Alias Jhandul Kumar

  4. 4.Shanti Devi

  5. 5.Punam Devi Alias Punam Kumari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

    Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners accused of assault, criminal intimidation, and theft in a land partition dispute case. The court found no criminal antecedents, missing injury documentation, and noted the case involved competing accusations between neighbors, allowing bail on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each and conditions under Section 482(2) BNSS, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  8. 04-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  9. 20-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 144/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners accused of assault, criminal intimidation, and theft in a land partition dispute case. The court found no criminal antecedents, missing injury documentation, and noted the case involved competing accusations between neighbors, allowing bail on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each and conditions under Section 482(2) BNSS, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case