Loha Singh alias Dipu Kumar vs State of Bihar — 79/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 17th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRPA200003562026
Filing Number
334/2026
Filing Date
17-Jan-2026
Registration No
79/2026
Registration Date
17-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Danapur
Judge
3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 04-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1237
Police Station
DANAPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Loha Singh alias Dipu Kumar
Adv. Kamlesh Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy of Order
The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Loha Singh, accused of murder under BNS sections 103(1) and 3(5), finding the offence serious and grave with sufficient material evidence against him, including witness statements, his presence with the deceased before death, and a confessional statement. The court determined that the nature of the crime (causing death by a heavy sharp object) and the strength of prosecution evidence warranted continued custody rather than bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
09-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
02-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
19-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 79/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Loha Singh, accused of murder under BNS sections 103(1) and 3(5), finding the offence serious and grave with sufficient material evidence against him, including witness statements, his presence with the deceased before death, and a confessional statement. The court determined that the nature of the crime (causing death by a heavy sharp object) and the strength of prosecution evidence warranted continued custody rather than bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts