Urmila Devi and others vs State of Bihar — 56/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),352,351(2),74,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRPA200000952026
Filing Number
95/2026
Filing Date
07-Jan-2026
Registration No
56/2026
Registration Date
07-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Danapur
Judge
5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 04-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
554
Police Station
NAUBATPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Urmila Devi and others
Adv. Sunil Kumar
-
2.Bichhi Devi
-
3.Bithal Manjhi
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The court granted anticipatory bail to three accused petitioners (Urmila Devi, Bichhi Devi, and Bithal Manjhi) charged with assault under BNS 2023, finding that custodial detention was unnecessary given the simple nature of injuries, unsubstantiated allegations under certain sections, and the accused's clean antecedents. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with sureties and comply with conditions including cooperation with investigation and presence during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV
-
09-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV
-
31-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV
-
22-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV
-
08-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 56/2026
The court granted anticipatory bail to three accused petitioners (Urmila Devi, Bichhi Devi, and Bithal Manjhi) charged with assault under BNS 2023, finding that custodial detention was unnecessary given the simple nature of injuries, unsubstantiated allegations under certain sections, and the accused's clean antecedents. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with sureties and comply with conditions including cooperation with investigation and presence during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts