Manish Kumar and others vs State of Bihar — 53/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,80. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 28th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA200000902026

Case disposed

Filing Number

90/2026

Filing Date

07-01-2026

Registration No

53/2026

Registration Date

07-01-2026

Court

DJ Div. Danapur

Judge

5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

Decision Date

28th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

165

Police Station

Sigori

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,80

Petitioner(s)

Manish Kumar and others

Adv. Ajay Kumar

Arti Kumari

Pappu Yadav

Chandeshwar Yadav

Ramuniya Devi

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

28-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

HEARING

12-03-2026

HEARING

11-03-2026

HEARING

26-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

28-03-2026
Copy of Order

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Danapur, rejected the anticipatory bail petition of five accused individuals charged under Sections 190 and 80(2) BNS in an alleged dowry death case. The court found the allegations grave and serious—involving a woman's death by poison within five years of marriage under suspicious circumstances with specific allegations of dowry-related cruelty—and determined that the petitioners did not deserve bail at this stage, though clarifying this decision would not prejudice the case's merits at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Danapur, rejected the anticipatory bail petition of five accused individuals charged under Sections 190 and 80(2) BNS in an alleged dowry death case. The court found the allegations grave and serious—involving a woman's death by poison within five years of marriage under suspicious circumstances with specific allegations of dowry-related cruelty—and determined that the petitioners did not deserve bail at this stage, though clarifying this decision would not prejudice the case's merits at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Danapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case