Akash KUmar vs State of Bihar — 43/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(5),318(4),338,336(3),340(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRPA200000742026
Filing Number
74/2026
Filing Date
06-Jan-2026
Registration No
43/2026
Registration Date
06-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Danapur
Judge
3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 04-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1234
Police Station
DANAPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Akash KUmar
Adv. Advocate
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of Order
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Akash Kumar, a 20-year-old employee accused of embezzling Rs. 25,88,547 from his employer Radiant Cash Management Service Limited by submitting forged deposit slips. The court found the allegations serious in nature involving substantial financial fraud of public money, and despite the petitioner's clean criminal record, denied bail as investigation was still pending with significant evidence yet to emerge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
09-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
24-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
07-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 43/2026
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Akash Kumar, a 20-year-old employee accused of embezzling Rs. 25,88,547 from his employer Radiant Cash Management Service Limited by submitting forged deposit slips. The court found the allegations serious in nature involving substantial financial fraud of public money, and despite the petitioner's clean criminal record, denied bail as investigation was still pending with significant evidence yet to emerge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts