Anil Kumar Ailas Anil Yadav vs State of Bihar — 28/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA200000442026

Filing Number

43/2026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

28/2026

Registration Date

05-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Danapur

Judge

6-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

401

Police Station

Rupaspur

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,352,351(2),3(5)
Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 3/4
I.t. Act 2000 Section 67

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anil Kumar Ailas Anil Yadav

    Adv. Advocate

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

  2. 2.Ankita Kumari

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Anil Kumar (accused under IPC sections 85, 352, 351(2), 3(5), Dowry Act, and IT Act) in a dowry harassment case, finding that granting bail was inappropriate given the serious allegations of harassment, threatening messages, abusive videos, and extortion of ₹25 lakhs from the complainant's family. The court noted the accused's responsibility as a husband to treat his wife with respect and dignity, and directed that office copies be sent to the subordinate court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V

  9. 28-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V

  10. 22-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V

  11. 17-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- V

  12. 06-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 05-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Anil Kumar (accused under IPC sections 85, 352, 351(2), 3(5), Dowry Act, and IT Act) in a dowry harassment case, finding that granting bail was inappropriate given the serious allegations of harassment, threatening messages, abusive videos, and extortion of ₹25 lakhs from the complainant's family. The court noted the accused's responsibility as a husband to treat his wife with respect and dignity, and directed that office copies be sent to the subordinate court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case