Shubham Kumar vs State of Bihar — 2230/2026

Case under Arms Act Section 25(1-b)(a)26(1)35. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st July 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail - ABP

CNR: BRPA010098632026

e-Filing Number

23-05-2026

Filing Number

10000/2026

Filing Date

23-May-2026

Registration No

2230/2026

Registration Date

23-May-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

122-Dasj II

Decision Date

01-Jul-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

467

Police Station

Ram Krishana Nagar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 25(1-b)(a)26(1)35

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shubham Kumar

    Adv. Mrityunjay Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jul-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to Shubham Kumar in an Arms Act case after finding that he was not named in the FIR, no incriminating articles were recovered from his possession, and his involvement was based solely on the confessional statement of co-accused Raviraj Kumar with no corroborating evidence. The petitioner was enlarged on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under BNSS 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jul-2026

    Disposed

    Dasj II

  4. 25-Jun-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj II

  5. 24-Jun-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj II

  6. 19-Jun-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj II

  7. 11-Jun-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj II

  8. 26-May-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj II

  9. 25-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 23-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2230/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to Shubham Kumar in an Arms Act case after finding that he was not named in the FIR, no incriminating articles were recovered from his possession, and his involvement was based solely on the confessional statement of co-accused Raviraj Kumar with no corroborating evidence. The petitioner was enlarged on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under BNSS 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case