The State of Bihar through Public Prosecution vs Manoj Kumar — 81/2019
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 378. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.
Cr. Appeal - Criminal Appeal
CNR: BRPA010061572019
Filing Number
3654/2019
Filing Date
25-Mar-2019
Registration No
81/2019
Registration Date
25-Mar-2019
Court
DJ Div. Patna Sadar
Judge
5-Dasj XXI
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
31
Police Station
Gopalpur
Year
2009
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar through Public Prosecution
Adv. P.P. Patna.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Manoj Kumar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment
Summary The Additional Sessions Court (Patna) dismissed the State of Bihar's appeal against Manoj Kumar's acquittal in an Arms Act case. The court upheld the trial court's acquittal, finding that prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt due to critical evidentiary gaps: the alleged threat victims (father-in-law and wife) were never examined as witnesses, the cartridge was found misfired (non-functional), evidence chain integrity was compromised as the cartridge was never sealed at crime scene, and only police witnesses testified rather than the two independent witnesses present at seizure. The appellate court agreed the prosecution's case suffered substantial defects rendering it wholly unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Dasj XXI
-
19-Mar-2026
Judgement
Dasj XXI
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
18-Feb-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
20-Jan-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
22-Dec-2025
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
23-Dec-2024
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
09-Dec-2024
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
05-Dec-2024
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
02-Dec-2024
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
25-Nov-2024
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
24-Oct-2024
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
12-Sep-2024
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
21-Aug-2024
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
19-Jul-2024
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
03-Jun-2024
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
01-Jun-2024
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
24-Apr-2024
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
14-Mar-2024
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
01-Feb-2024
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
14-Dec-2023
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
22-Nov-2023
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
03-Oct-2023
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
31-Aug-2023
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
03-Aug-2023
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
06-Jul-2023
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
31-May-2023
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
01-May-2023
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
01-Apr-2023
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
27-Feb-2023
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
13-Jan-2023
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
30-Nov-2022
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
18-Oct-2022
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
08-Sep-2022
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
05-Aug-2022
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
20-Jun-2022
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
10-May-2022
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
07-Apr-2022
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
08-Mar-2022
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
15-Feb-2022
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
19-Jan-2022
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
20-Dec-2021
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
20-Nov-2021
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
27-Aug-2021
Hearing
Dasj XII
-
08-Jun-2021
Hearing
Dasj XII
-
13-Apr-2021
Hearing
Dasj XII
-
10-Mar-2021
Hearing
Dasj XII
-
08-Feb-2021
Hearing
Dasj XII
-
02-Dec-2020
Hearing
Dasj XII
-
09-Sep-2020
Hearing
Dasj XII
-
23-Jun-2020
Hearing
Dasj XII
-
28-Apr-2020
Hearing
Dasj XII
-
16-Mar-2020
Hearing
Dasj XII
-
14-Feb-2020
Hearing
Dasj XII
-
13-Jan-2020
Hearing
Dasj XII
-
06-Dec-2019
Hearing
Dasj XII
-
15-Oct-2019
Hearing
Dasj XII
-
20-Sep-2019
Hearing
Dasj XII
-
04-Aug-2019
Hearing
Dasj XII
-
05-Jul-2019
Hearing
Dasj XII
-
10-Jun-2019
Hearing
Dasj XII
-
26-Apr-2019
Hearing
Dasj XII
-
26-Mar-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Mar-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 81/2019
Summary The Additional Sessions Court (Patna) dismissed the State of Bihar's appeal against Manoj Kumar's acquittal in an Arms Act case. The court upheld the trial court's acquittal, finding that prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt due to critical evidentiary gaps: the alleged threat victims (father-in-law and wife) were never examined as witnesses, the cartridge was found misfired (non-functional), evidence chain integrity was compromised as the cartridge was never sealed at crime scene, and only police witnesses testified rather than the two independent witnesses present at seizure. The appellate court agreed the prosecution's case suffered substantial defects rendering it wholly unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts