Jitendra Prasad singh vs State of Bihar — 219/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,439. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.
Cr. Rev. - Criminal Revision
CNR: BRPA010051122026
e-Filing Number
16-03-2026
Filing Number
4443/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
219/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Patna Sadar
Judge
102-Dasj VIII
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
3116
Police Station
Complaint Private
Year
2011
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jitendra Prasad singh
Adv. PRATIK KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
-
2.Pawan Kumar Singh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Copy of Order
Case Summary: Jitendra Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge set aside the lower court's order declaring Jitendra Prasad Singh an absconder and issuing proclamation and attachment under Sections 82-83 of the Criminal Procedure Code, finding the magistrate violated mandatory procedural requirements by failing to show proper service of summons or bailable warrants before escalating to coercive measures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Dasj VIII
-
07-Apr-2026
Order
Dasj VIII
-
30-Mar-2026
IA order
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
Dasj VIII
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
Dasj VIII
-
24-Mar-2026
Awaiting for L. C. R.
Dasj VIII
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Dasj VIII
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of Order
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 219/2026
Case Summary: Jitendra Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge set aside the lower court's order declaring Jitendra Prasad Singh an absconder and issuing proclamation and attachment under Sections 82-83 of the Criminal Procedure Code, finding the magistrate violated mandatory procedural requirements by failing to show proper service of summons or bailable warrants before escalating to coercive measures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts