GAURAV KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 1089/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 419,420,467,468,471,120(B). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail - ABP
CNR: BRPA010050982026
e-Filing Number
17-03-2026
Filing Number
4429/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
1089/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Patna Sadar
Judge
135-Dasj XXXI
Decision Date
24-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
19
Police Station
GANDHI MAIDAN
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GAURAV KUMAR
Adv. Yashwant Kumar Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The court allowed Gaurav Kumar's anticipatory bail application in a fraud case involving unauthorized bank account opening (Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 19/2021, registered under IPC Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B). The court found that Kumar had no criminal history, physical verification wasn't mandatory during the 2021 COVID period, and no flight risk existed. Kumar was directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount within three weeks of order communication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
Disposed
Dasj XXXI
-
23-Apr-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXXI
-
17-Apr-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXXI
-
10-Apr-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXXI
-
26-Mar-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
Dasj XXXI
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXXI
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1089/2026
The court allowed Gaurav Kumar's anticipatory bail application in a fraud case involving unauthorized bank account opening (Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 19/2021, registered under IPC Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B). The court found that Kumar had no criminal history, physical verification wasn't mandatory during the 2021 COVID period, and no flight risk existed. Kumar was directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount within three weeks of order communication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts