DR NIGAM PRAKASH NARAIN vs State of Bihar — 1084/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304,34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail - ABP

CNR: BRPA010050932026

e-Filing Number

17-03-2026

Filing Number

4424/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

1084/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

134-Dasj XXX

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

294

Police Station

PIRBAHORE

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 304,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DR NIGAM PRAKASH NARAIN

    Adv. Brajesh Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court allowed Dr. Nigam Prakash Narain's anticipatory bail petition in a death case arising from a child's death at PMCH hospital in 2014. The court found insufficient evidence against the 76-year-old doctor, noting the informant's complaint emerged after 11 years, the petitioner was off-duty during the incident, and no investigative material supported his involvement—only the late statement of the informant. The petitioner was granted bail on condition of Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties and attendance at prosecution witness examination dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Dasj XXX

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj XXX

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj XXX

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj XXX

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1084/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Dr. Nigam Prakash Narain's anticipatory bail petition in a death case arising from a child's death at PMCH hospital in 2014. The court found insufficient evidence against the 76-year-old doctor, noting the informant's complaint emerged after 11 years, the petitioner was off-duty during the incident, and no investigative material supported his involvement—only the late statement of the informant. The petitioner was granted bail on condition of Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties and attendance at prosecution witness examination dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case