Sanny Kumar vs State of Bihar — 1074/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,115(2),126(2),74,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail - ABP

CNR: BRPA010050712026

e-Filing Number

17-03-2026

Filing Number

4406/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

1074/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

203

Police Station

JAKKAN-PUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,115(2),126(2),74,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sanny Kumar

    Adv. Upendra Kumar

  2. 2.Money Kumar

    Adv. Upendra Kumar

  3. 3.Anil Rajak

    Adv. Upendra Kumar

  4. 4.Gyati vi

    Adv. Upendra Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy of Order

    Case 1074/2026 Summary: The Sessions Judge, Patna granted anticipatory bail to Sanny Kumar, Money Kumar, Anil Rajak, and Gyanti Devi in a land dispute case involving charges of assault and outraging modesty. The court found that arrest was unnecessary during investigation, the informant's injuries were treated as outpatient (no medico-legal case recorded), and all petitioners had clean criminal antecedents. Each petitioner was released on Rs. 10,000 bail with two sureties upon arrest or surrender within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1074/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 1074/2026 Summary: The Sessions Judge, Patna granted anticipatory bail to Sanny Kumar, Money Kumar, Anil Rajak, and Gyanti Devi in a land dispute case involving charges of assault and outraging modesty. The court found that arrest was unnecessary during investigation, the informant's injuries were treated as outpatient (no medico-legal case recorded), and all petitioners had clean criminal antecedents. Each petitioner was released on Rs. 10,000 bail with two sureties upon arrest or surrender within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case