Rahul Kumar vs State of Bihar — 746/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(c),21(b). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail - BP

CNR: BRPA010050632026

e-Filing Number

17-03-2026

Filing Number

4401/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

746/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

251

Police Station

Ram Krishana Nagar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(c),21(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rahul Kumar

    Adv. Ram kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case 746/2026 Summary: The Special Judge (NDPS), Patna rejected Rahul Kumar's bail application on 04-04-2026. Kumar was arrested on 13-03-2026 with 14 grams of brown sugar (exceeding "small quantity" under NDPS Act, 1985) under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act. The court found the charges serious, noted Kumar's prior criminal record, ongoing investigation, and pending charge-sheet, concluding bail was not warranted despite defense arguments of false implication and procedural irregularities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 746/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 746/2026 Summary: The Special Judge (NDPS), Patna rejected Rahul Kumar's bail application on 04-04-2026. Kumar was arrested on 13-03-2026 with 14 grams of brown sugar (exceeding "small quantity" under NDPS Act, 1985) under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act. The court found the charges serious, noted Kumar's prior criminal record, ongoing investigation, and pending charge-sheet, concluding bail was not warranted despite defense arguments of false implication and procedural irregularities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case