Jitendra Kumar vs State of Bihar — 1071/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail - ABP
CNR: BRPA010050432026
e-Filing Number
16-03-2026
Filing Number
4387/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
1071/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Patna Sadar
Judge
102-Dasj VIII
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11493
Police Station
Complaint Private
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jitendra Kumar
Adv. Ashok Kumar Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Copy of Order
Case Summary: Jitendra Kumar v. State of Bihar (A.B.P. 1071/2026) Decision: The court granted anticipatory bail to Jitendra Kumar. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the complainant alleged the petitioner obtained ₹6 lakh on false pretense and issued dishonored cheques, the complainant provided no documentary evidence of actually giving the money. The court characterized the dispute as primarily civil in nature involving a financial transaction rather than criminal fraud, with no interrogation requirement. The petitioner was released on bail of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, conditioned on surrender within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
Dasj VIII
-
20-Apr-2026
Hearing
Dasj VIII
-
17-Apr-2026
Hearing
Dasj VIII
-
16-Apr-2026
Hearing
Dasj VIII
-
09-Apr-2026
Hearing
Dasj VIII
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
Dasj VIII
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1071/2026
Case Summary: Jitendra Kumar v. State of Bihar (A.B.P. 1071/2026) Decision: The court granted anticipatory bail to Jitendra Kumar. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the complainant alleged the petitioner obtained ₹6 lakh on false pretense and issued dishonored cheques, the complainant provided no documentary evidence of actually giving the money. The court characterized the dispute as primarily civil in nature involving a financial transaction rather than criminal fraud, with no interrogation requirement. The petitioner was released on bail of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, conditioned on surrender within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts