Anand Kumar vs State of Bihar — 1070/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,409,420,467,34. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail - ABP

CNR: BRPA010050382026

e-Filing Number

16-03-2026

Filing Number

4384/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

1070/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

136-Dasj XXXII

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

101

Police Station

PHULWARI

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 406,409,420,467,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anand Kumar

    Adv. SAURABH ANAND

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Copy of Order

    Case Summary: Anand Kumar v. State of Bihar (1070/2026) The court rejected Anand Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving alleged embezzlement of Rs. 1,64,823 from AIIMS Patna through systematic manipulation of patient billing records. The court found the allegations serious, involving criminal breach of trust, forgery, and cheating at a public medical institution, and determined that such grave offences warrant custody for investigation, noting the petitioner's defenses must be tested during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Dasj XXXII

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Order

    Dasj XXXII

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj XXXII

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj XXXII

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1070/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Anand Kumar v. State of Bihar (1070/2026) The court rejected Anand Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving alleged embezzlement of Rs. 1,64,823 from AIIMS Patna through systematic manipulation of patient billing records. The court found the allegations serious, involving criminal breach of trust, forgery, and cheating at a public medical institution, and determined that such grave offences warrant custody for investigation, noting the petitioner's defenses must be tested during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case