Anshu Raj Kumar vs State of Bihar — 697/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 21,22(B). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail - BP

CNR: BRPA010047802026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

4167/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

697/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

228

Police Station

AGAMKUAN

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 21,22(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anshu Raj Kumar

    Adv. Laleshwar Prasad Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Special Judge (NDPS), Patna rejected the bail application of Anshu Raj Kumar, who was arrested in an NDPS case involving 10,800 tablets of Alprazolam (5.4 grams) recovered from his possession. The court found the quantum of recovery exceeded the "small quantity" threshold under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, and considering the serious nature of the offense, ongoing investigation, and pending chargesheet, determined bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 697/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge (NDPS), Patna rejected the bail application of Anshu Raj Kumar, who was arrested in an NDPS case involving 10,800 tablets of Alprazolam (5.4 grams) recovered from his possession. The court found the quantum of recovery exceeded the "small quantity" threshold under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, and considering the serious nature of the offense, ongoing investigation, and pending chargesheet, determined bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case