PAWAN KUMAR YADAV vs State of Bihar — 694/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(c),20(b)(ii),21(b),22(g). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail - BP

CNR: BRPA010047752026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

4162/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

694/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

163

Police Station

MANER

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(c),20(b)(ii),21(b),22(g)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAWAN KUMAR YADAV

    Adv. Indu Bhushan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Special Judge (NDPS), Patna rejected the regular bail application of Pawan Kumar Yadav, who was arrested on drug charges under the NDPS Act. The court found that the quantity of narcotics recovered (13.31 grams of smack, 5.70 grams of smack, and 8.96 grams of ganja) exceeded the "small quantity" threshold, investigation was ongoing with no chargesheet yet filed, making it unsuitable for bail grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 694/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge (NDPS), Patna rejected the regular bail application of Pawan Kumar Yadav, who was arrested on drug charges under the NDPS Act. The court found that the quantity of narcotics recovered (13.31 grams of smack, 5.70 grams of smack, and 8.96 grams of ganja) exceeded the "small quantity" threshold, investigation was ongoing with no chargesheet yet filed, making it unsuitable for bail grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case