POONAM DUBEY vs State of Bihar — 1018/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),318(4),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail - ABP

CNR: BRPA010047642026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

4151/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1018/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

106-Dasj XIII

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

138

Police Station

DIGHA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),318(4),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.POONAM DUBEY

    Adv. VIKKY KUMAR

  2. 2.ASHISH KUMAR

    Adv. VIKKY KUMAR

  3. 3.AYUSH KUMAR

    Adv. VIKKY KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Copy of Order

    The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Poonam Devi, Ashish Kumar, and Ayush Kumar, finding no serious allegations against them in a case involving alleged unauthorized credit card withdrawals of ₹2.8 lakh. The court accepted the accused's argument that the dispute arose from family financial transactions that were continuous and voluntary in nature, with traceable banking records, rather than criminal cheating. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Disposed

    Dasj XIII

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Copy of Order

  5. 13-Apr-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Dasj XIII

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy of Order

  7. 02-Apr-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Dasj XIII

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Dasj XIII

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj XIII

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1018/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Poonam Devi, Ashish Kumar, and Ayush Kumar, finding no serious allegations against them in a case involving alleged unauthorized credit card withdrawals of ₹2.8 lakh. The court accepted the accused's argument that the dispute arose from family financial transactions that were continuous and voluntary in nature, with traceable banking records, rather than criminal cheating. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case