Usha devi vs State of Bihar — 1016/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),324(4),352,351(2),3(5). Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 27th May 2026.
Anticipatory Bail - ABP
CNR: BRPA010047542026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
4141/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
1016/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Patna Sadar
Judge
102-Dasj VIII
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
175
Police Station
Ram Krishana Nagar
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Usha devi
Adv. Mithilesh kumar
-
2.Pushpa kumari
Adv. Mithilesh kumar
-
3.Ravi raushan
Adv. Mithilesh kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
27-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-May-2026
Hearing
Dasj VIII
-
08-May-2026
Hearing
Dasj VIII
-
27-Apr-2026
Hearing
Dasj VIII
-
23-Apr-2026
Hearing
Dasj VIII
-
17-Apr-2026
Hearing
Dasj VIII
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
Dasj VIII
-
13-Mar-2026
IA orderView PDF
Summary: The Court granted "No Coercive Step" protection to petitioners Usha Devi, Pushapa Kumari, and Ravi Bhushan in an anticipatory bail application. The petitioners are protected from arrest in Ramkrishna Nagar P.S. Case No. 175/2026 (offences u/s 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 324(4), 352, 351(2), and 3(5) B.N.S.) until final hearing, subject to compliance with Section 482 B.N.S.S. conditions. The case is adjourned to 01.04.2026 for final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Dasj VIII
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1016/2026
Summary: The Court granted "No Coercive Step" protection to petitioners Usha Devi, Pushapa Kumari, and Ravi Bhushan in an anticipatory bail application. The petitioners are protected from arrest in Ramkrishna Nagar P.S. Case No. 175/2026 (offences u/s 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 324(4), 352, 351(2), and 3(5) B.N.S.) until final hearing, subject to compliance with Section 482 B.N.S.S. conditions. The case is adjourned to 01.04.2026 for final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts