Vikash Kumar vs State of Bihar — 1014/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(3)190,109,118(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 30th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail - ABP

CNR: BRPA010047512026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

4138/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

1014/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

96

Police Station

BUDHA COLONY

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(3)190,109,118(1)
Arms Act Section 25(1-B)(a)27

Petitioner(s)

Vikash Kumar

Adv. ROSHAN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

30-03-2026

Disposed

28-03-2026

HEARING

25-03-2026

ORDER

24-03-2026

HEARING

23-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Copy of Order

The Sessions Judge rejected Vikash Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a firearm incident case where he sustained multiple gunshot injuries. The court found that despite the petitioner's clean criminal record and serious injuries, the prosecution's evidence—including a co-accused's confessional statement, recovered pistol, and CCTV footage suggesting his involvement in the exchange of gunfire—warranted denial, particularly given the ongoing investigation and pending chargesheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

12-03-2026
Copy of Order
18-03-2026
Copy of Order
24-03-2026
Copy of Order
25-03-2026
Copy of Order
28-03-2026
Copy of Order
casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge rejected Vikash Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a firearm incident case where he sustained multiple gunshot injuries. The court found that despite the petitioner's clean criminal record and serious injuries, the prosecution's evidence—including a co-accused's confessional statement, recovered pistol, and CCTV footage suggesting his involvement in the exchange of gunfire—warranted denial, particularly given the ongoing investigation and pending chargesheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case