Prince Kumar vs State of Bihar — 1012/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 366,366(A),376,120(B),34. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail - ABP

CNR: BRPA010047472026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

4134/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1012/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

3-Ex. Court POCSO - I

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

100

Police Station

PANDARAK

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 366,366(A),376,120(B),34
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Prince Kumar

    Adv. RAVI KUMAR PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of a 15-year-old petitioner accused of enticing and marrying a 16-year-old girl under the POCSO Act and IPC sections. The court found that the petitioner had already surrendered by appearing before it for juvenility determination, thereby eliminating any genuine apprehension of arrest. After declaring the petitioner a juvenile, the case was transferred to the Juvenile Justice Board, which is the appropriate forum to decide his release under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act based on reformative principles. The court emphasized that both children were minors of comparable age acting under emotional immaturity, warranting a child-centric, protective approach rather than strict criminal liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Disposed

    Ex. Court POCSO - I

  4. 04-May-2026

    Hearing

    Ex. Court POCSO - I

  5. 02-May-2026

    Hearing

    Ex. Court POCSO - I

  6. 30-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Ex. Court POCSO - I

  7. 29-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Ex. Court POCSO - I

  8. 23-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Ex. Court POCSO - I

  9. 16-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Ex. Court POCSO - I

  10. 15-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Ex. Court POCSO - I

  11. 08-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Ex. Court POCSO - I

  12. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Ex. Court POCSO - I

  13. 01-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Ex. Court POCSO - I

  14. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Ex. Court POCSO - I

  15. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Ex. Court POCSO - I

  16. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Ex. Court POCSO - I

  17. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1012/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of a 15-year-old petitioner accused of enticing and marrying a 16-year-old girl under the POCSO Act and IPC sections. The court found that the petitioner had already surrendered by appearing before it for juvenility determination, thereby eliminating any genuine apprehension of arrest. After declaring the petitioner a juvenile, the case was transferred to the Juvenile Justice Board, which is the appropriate forum to decide his release under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act based on reformative principles. The court emphasized that both children were minors of comparable age acting under emotional immaturity, warranting a child-centric, protective approach rather than strict criminal liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case