Chintu Kumar vs State of Bihar — 687/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8,20(B)IIB. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail - BP

CNR: BRPA010047462026

Filing Number

4133/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

687/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

82

Police Station

Nadi PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8,20(B)IIB
Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 Section 30(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chintu Kumar

    Adv. MD. AAMIR SUHAIL

  2. 2.Mukesh Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Special Judge (NDPS), Patna rejected the bail application of Chintu Kumar and Mukesh Kumar, who were arrested in connection with a ganja trafficking case under the NDPS Act. The court found that the 2.193 kg ganja recovered exceeded the "small quantity" threshold, the investigation was ongoing, and the allegations were serious, making bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 687/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge (NDPS), Patna rejected the bail application of Chintu Kumar and Mukesh Kumar, who were arrested in connection with a ganja trafficking case under the NDPS Act. The court found that the 2.193 kg ganja recovered exceeded the "small quantity" threshold, the investigation was ongoing, and the allegations were serious, making bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case