MANISH KUMAR ALIAS KRISHNA CHAUDHARY vs State of Bihar — 1011/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,447,307,387,427,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail - ABP
CNR: BRPA010047442026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
4131/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
1011/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Patna Sadar
Judge
118-Dasj XVIII
Decision Date
04-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
298
Police Station
PHULWARI
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANISH KUMAR ALIAS KRISHNA CHAUDHARY
Adv. Ashok Kumar Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Apr-2026
Copy of Order
The Additional Sessions Judge XVIII, Patna granted anticipatory bail to Manish Kumar @ Krishna Chaudhary in a case involving rioting and weapon-related charges under IPC sections 147-149, 307, 387, 427, 506, and Arms Act section 27. The court found no specific allegations against the petitioner and noted his clean criminal record and that co-accused had been similarly granted bail. The petitioner was ordered released on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Apr-2026
Disposed
Dasj XVIII
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
Dasj XVIII
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy of Order
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Dasj XVIII
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Dasj XVIII
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1011/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge XVIII, Patna granted anticipatory bail to Manish Kumar @ Krishna Chaudhary in a case involving rioting and weapon-related charges under IPC sections 147-149, 307, 387, 427, 506, and Arms Act section 27. The court found no specific allegations against the petitioner and noted his clean criminal record and that co-accused had been similarly granted bail. The petitioner was ordered released on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts