Sashi Kumar vs State of Bihar — 686/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 21,22(B). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail - BP

CNR: BRPA010047342026

Filing Number

4121/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

686/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

228

Police Station

AGAMKUAN

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 21,22(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sashi Kumar

    Adv. Gyan Prakash

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge/Special Judge (NDPS), Patna rejected the bail application of Sashi Kumar, who was arrested on March 8, 2026, for alleged NDPS Act violations (Sections 21, 22) following recovery of 10,800 Alprazolam tablets (5.4 grams) from his possession. The court found the quantity exceeded the "small quantity" threshold under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, and noted that investigation was ongoing with the chargesheet still pending, making it an unfit case for regular bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 686/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge/Special Judge (NDPS), Patna rejected the bail application of Sashi Kumar, who was arrested on March 8, 2026, for alleged NDPS Act violations (Sections 21, 22) following recovery of 10,800 Alprazolam tablets (5.4 grams) from his possession. The court found the quantity exceeded the "small quantity" threshold under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, and noted that investigation was ongoing with the chargesheet still pending, making it an unfit case for regular bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case