ADITYA KUMAR ALIAS JOHNSON vs State of Bihar — 680/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 21(B),298A(C). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail - BP

CNR: BRPA010047102026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

4100/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

680/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

76

Police Station

CITY CHOWK

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 21(B),298A(C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ADITYA KUMAR ALIAS JOHNSON

    Adv. MUNNA PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the bail application of Aditya Kumar @ Johnson in an NDPS drug case, finding that 51 grams of smack recovered exceeds the "small quantity" threshold and citing the petitioner's three prior criminal cases. The court determined that given the serious nature of the charges, the quantity of drugs involved, the accused's criminal history, and the ongoing investigation, bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 680/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application of Aditya Kumar @ Johnson in an NDPS drug case, finding that 51 grams of smack recovered exceeds the "small quantity" threshold and citing the petitioner's three prior criminal cases. The court determined that given the serious nature of the charges, the quantity of drugs involved, the accused's criminal history, and the ongoing investigation, bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case