Manjeet Kumar alias Bunty vs State of Bihar — 84/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.
Cr. Miscellaneous - Criminal Miscellaneous
CNR: BRPA010046252026
Filing Number
4026/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
84/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Patna Sadar
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Manjeet Kumar alias Bunty
Adv. Vikash Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Copy of Order
The Sessions Judge, Patna allowed the criminal miscellaneous petition and modified the previous anticipatory bail order dated 25.02.2026 to correct factual errors: changing "89 bottles" to "890 bottles" and "890 litres" to "89 litres" of seized cough syrup, and clarifying that co-accused Pawan Kumar was the tenant while petitioner Manjeet Kumar was implicated based on Kumar's confessional statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing On Admission
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing On Admission
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing On Admission
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing On Admission
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 84/2026
The Sessions Judge, Patna allowed the criminal miscellaneous petition and modified the previous anticipatory bail order dated 25.02.2026 to correct factual errors: changing "89 bottles" to "890 bottles" and "890 litres" to "89 litres" of seized cough syrup, and clarifying that co-accused Pawan Kumar was the tenant while petitioner Manjeet Kumar was implicated based on Kumar's confessional statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts