Nagendra Ray and Others vs State of Bihar — 908/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),324(4),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail - ABP

CNR: BRPA010041632026

e-Filing Number

27-02-2026

Filing Number

3634/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

908/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

577

Police Station

KANKAR BAGH

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),324(4),352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nagendra Ray and Others

    Adv. Hari Shankar Kumar Sinha

  2. 2.Tuntun Yadav

    Adv. Hari Shankar Kumar Sinha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

    Case 908/2026 Summary: The Sessions Judge, Patna granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Nagendra Ray and Tuntun Yadav, who faced charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly breaking into property, theft, and assault on 29.06.2025. The court found the allegations against the petitioners were general and vague without specific attribution, noted that similarly situated co-accused had already been granted bail, and considered that the injured party did not seek medical treatment, warranting bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    Copy of Order

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 908/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 908/2026 Summary: The Sessions Judge, Patna granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Nagendra Ray and Tuntun Yadav, who faced charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly breaking into property, theft, and assault on 29.06.2025. The court found the allegations against the petitioners were general and vague without specific attribution, noted that similarly situated co-accused had already been granted bail, and considered that the injured party did not seek medical treatment, warranting bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case