Rajesh Chandra Jain vs State of Bihar — 905/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail - ABP
CNR: BRPA010041452026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
3617/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
905/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Patna Sadar
Judge
13-Dasj I
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
992
Police Station
Complaint Private
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajesh Chandra Jain
Adv. SUNIL KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
SUMMARY: The District and Sessions Court, Patna granted anticipatory bail to Rajesh Chandra Jain in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case (IPC sections 406/420) involving an alleged ₹10 lakh investment fraud related to the "Dumraon Palace" project. The court found that since the case is based on a complaint yet to be proved, no custodial trial is required at this stage, and the petitioner posed no flight risk or witness tampering threat. Bail was granted on a ₹15,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, conditioned on full cooperation with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Disposed
Dasj I
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing
Dasj I
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
Dasj I
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 905/2026
SUMMARY: The District and Sessions Court, Patna granted anticipatory bail to Rajesh Chandra Jain in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case (IPC sections 406/420) involving an alleged ₹10 lakh investment fraud related to the "Dumraon Palace" project. The court found that since the case is based on a complaint yet to be proved, no custodial trial is required at this stage, and the petitioner posed no flight risk or witness tampering threat. Bail was granted on a ₹15,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, conditioned on full cooperation with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts