Sonu Kumar vs State of Bihar — 598/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8,20(B)iiC. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail - BP

CNR: BRPA010040832026

Filing Number

3556/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

598/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

36

Police Station

Nadi PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8,20(B)iiC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sonu Kumar

    Adv. PRIYANKA KUMARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Special Judge (NDPS) Patna rejected the regular bail application of Sonu Kumar, who was arrested for possession of 13.160 kg ganja during a vehicle check, exceeding the "small quantity" threshold under the NDPS Act. The court denied bail considering the serious nature of the allegations, the substantial quantity recovered, and the ongoing investigation with the charge sheet yet to be filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 598/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Special Judge (NDPS) Patna rejected the regular bail application of Sonu Kumar, who was arrested for possession of 13.160 kg ganja during a vehicle check, exceeding the "small quantity" threshold under the NDPS Act. The court denied bail considering the serious nature of the allegations, the substantial quantity recovered, and the ongoing investigation with the charge sheet yet to be filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case