Ramesh Prasad vs State of Bihar — 872/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 112(2)(a). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail - ABP

CNR: BRPA010040582026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

3532/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

872/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

975

Police Station

MANER

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 112(2)(a)
N.D.P.S.Act Section 8(c),18(b),21(c),22(b),22(c),30,31
Indian Arms Act Section 25(1-B),(a),26,35
BIHAR PROHIBITION AND EXCISE ACT 2016 Section 30(a)

Petitioner(s)

Ramesh Prasad

Adv. Priti Kumari

Lal Kumae urf Shashank Kumar

Adv. Priti Kumari

Piyush Kumar

Adv. Priti Kumari

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

07-04-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

HEARING

02-04-2026

ORDER

26-03-2026

HEARING

24-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
Copy of Order

The Special Judge (NDPS) Patna rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ramesh Prasad, Lal Kumar, and Piyush Kumar in a drug trafficking case. The court found that 6.36 grams of smack recovered exceeded the "small quantity" threshold under the NDPS Act 1985, and considered the petitioners' prior criminal antecedents and family connection to a co-accused as significant factors against granting bail while investigation was ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge (NDPS) Patna rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ramesh Prasad, Lal Kumar, and Piyush Kumar in a drug trafficking case. The court found that 6.36 grams of smack recovered exceeded the "small quantity" threshold under the NDPS Act 1985, and considered the petitioners' prior criminal antecedents and family connection to a co-accused as significant factors against granting bail while investigation was ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case