Ramesh Prasad vs State of Bihar — 872/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 112(2)(a). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail - ABP
CNR: BRPA010040582026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
3532/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
872/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Patna Sadar
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
975
Police Station
MANER
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramesh Prasad
Adv. Priti Kumari
-
2.Lal Kumae urf Shashank Kumar
Adv. Priti Kumari
-
3.Piyush Kumar
Adv. Priti Kumari
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Special Judge (NDPS) Patna rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ramesh Prasad, Lal Kumar, and Piyush Kumar in a drug trafficking case. The court found that 6.36 grams of smack recovered exceeded the "small quantity" threshold under the NDPS Act 1985, and considered the petitioners' prior criminal antecedents and family connection to a co-accused as significant factors against granting bail while investigation was ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 872/2026
The Special Judge (NDPS) Patna rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ramesh Prasad, Lal Kumar, and Piyush Kumar in a drug trafficking case. The court found that 6.36 grams of smack recovered exceeded the "small quantity" threshold under the NDPS Act 1985, and considered the petitioners' prior criminal antecedents and family connection to a co-accused as significant factors against granting bail while investigation was ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts