Raj Kumar Ray vs State of Bihar — 582/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 20,22. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail - BP

CNR: BRPA010040112026

Filing Number

3490/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

582/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

522

Police Station

Fatuah

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 20,22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Raj Kumar Ray

    Adv. Manoj kumar 1st

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Special Judge (NDPS), Patna rejected Raj Kumar Rai's bail application in a case involving recovery of 5 kg ganja under the NDPS Act. The court found that the quantum of recovery exceeded the "small quantity" threshold, the co-accused had disclosed the petitioner as the vehicle driver, and the investigation was still ongoing with no charge sheet filed, making it an unfit case for bail grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 582/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge (NDPS), Patna rejected Raj Kumar Rai's bail application in a case involving recovery of 5 kg ganja under the NDPS Act. The court found that the quantum of recovery exceeded the "small quantity" threshold, the co-accused had disclosed the petitioner as the vehicle driver, and the investigation was still ongoing with no charge sheet filed, making it an unfit case for bail grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case