Rahul Kumar vs State of Bihar — 557/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(c),21(b). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail - BP

CNR: BRPA010038332026

Filing Number

3336/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

557/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

85

Police Station

NAUBATPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(c),21(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rahul Kumar

    Adv. Ram Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Special Judge (NDPS) Patna rejected Rahul Kumar's bail application on 18-03-2026. Kumar was arrested on 13-02-2026 after 14.25 grams of smack was recovered from his possession, charged under NDPS Act Sections 8(c) and 21(b). The court found the quantity exceeded the "small quantity" threshold, investigation was ongoing without a chargesheet filed, and the allegations were serious in nature, making bail inappropriate at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 557/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge (NDPS) Patna rejected Rahul Kumar's bail application on 18-03-2026. Kumar was arrested on 13-02-2026 after 14.25 grams of smack was recovered from his possession, charged under NDPS Act Sections 8(c) and 21(b). The court found the quantity exceeded the "small quantity" threshold, investigation was ongoing without a chargesheet filed, and the allegations were serious in nature, making bail inappropriate at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case