Shubham Kumar vs State of Bihar — 543/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(C)21(b). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail - BP

CNR: BRPA010037482026

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

3257/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

543/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

3

Police Station

GAURI CHAK

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(C)21(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shubham Kumar

    Adv. Mukesh Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Bail Application No. 543/2026 Court Decision: The Special Judge (NDPS), Patna rejected Shubham Kumar's regular bail application on 18.03.2026. Key Reasoning: The court found that 1.79 grams of smack recovered from petitioner's possession, as part of a total 31.56 grams seized from all accused persons, exceeds the "small quantity" threshold under the NDPS Act. Given the serious nature of the charges under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act, ongoing investigation, and pending chargesheet, the court deemed bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 543/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bail Application No. 543/2026 Court Decision: The Special Judge (NDPS), Patna rejected Shubham Kumar's regular bail application on 18.03.2026. Key Reasoning: The court found that 1.79 grams of smack recovered from petitioner's possession, as part of a total 31.56 grams seized from all accused persons, exceeds the "small quantity" threshold under the NDPS Act. Given the serious nature of the charges under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act, ongoing investigation, and pending chargesheet, the court deemed bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case