Santi Devi vs State of Bihar — 797/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 26th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail - ABP
CNR: BRPA010036002026
Filing Number
3124/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
797/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Patna Sadar
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
36
Police Station
DIGHA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Santi Devi
Adv. Binay Kumar
-
2.Ajay Sao
-
3.Santosh Kumar
-
4.Poonam Kumari
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Copy of Order
Case 797/2026 Summary: The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Santi Devi, Ajay Sao, Santosh Kumar, and Poonam Kumari in a dowry death case (BNS §80(2) read with §3(5)). Though the petitioners were not named in the FIR and had clean records, the court denied bail considering the heinous nature of the offense, their status as in-laws of the deceased, prosecution witness support, and ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of Order
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of Order
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
Copy of Order
-
21-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 797/2026
Case 797/2026 Summary: The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Santi Devi, Ajay Sao, Santosh Kumar, and Poonam Kumari in a dowry death case (BNS §80(2) read with §3(5)). Though the petitioners were not named in the FIR and had clean records, the court denied bail considering the heinous nature of the offense, their status as in-laws of the deceased, prosecution witness support, and ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts