Amit Kumar Singh vs State of Bihar — 66/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Miscellaneous - Criminal Miscellaneous

CNR: BRPA010035982026

Filing Number

3122/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

66/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Amit Kumar Singh

    Adv. Sunil Kumar singh 2

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Copy of Order

    The Sessions Judge, Patna allowed the transfer application and directed that Complaint Case No. 13165(C)/2022 be transferred from the court of Ms. Priyanka Yadav (on maternity leave) to the court of Ms. Nandini for hearing and disposal. The court found the transfer necessary in the interest of justice to ensure speedy disposal, as the case had stagnated due to the presiding judge's extended leave, and no prejudice would be caused to the opposite party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Admission

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Admission

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 66/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Patna allowed the transfer application and directed that Complaint Case No. 13165(C)/2022 be transferred from the court of Ms. Priyanka Yadav (on maternity leave) to the court of Ms. Nandini for hearing and disposal. The court found the transfer necessary in the interest of justice to ensure speedy disposal, as the case had stagnated due to the presiding judge's extended leave, and no prejudice would be caused to the opposite party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case