Chandan Kumar Paswan vs State of Bihar — 688/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(c),21(b). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail - ABP

CNR: BRPA010032332026

Filing Number

2813/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

688/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

54

Police Station

NAUBATPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(c),21(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chandan Kumar Paswan

    Adv. Om Prakash

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Special Judge (NDPS), Patna rejected Chandan Kumar Paswan's anticipatory bail application in a drug trafficking case under the NDPS Act. The court found that the petitioner's name surfaced in the disclosure statement of the arrested co-accused from whom 28.76 grams of smack was recovered, and given the serious nature of the allegations, ongoing investigation, and pending chargesheet, anticipatory bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 688/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge (NDPS), Patna rejected Chandan Kumar Paswan's anticipatory bail application in a drug trafficking case under the NDPS Act. The court found that the petitioner's name surfaced in the disclosure statement of the arrested co-accused from whom 28.76 grams of smack was recovered, and given the serious nature of the allegations, ongoing investigation, and pending chargesheet, anticipatory bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case