Sanoj Yadav vs State of Bihar — 433/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 21,22(B),25,29. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail - BP

CNR: BRPA010030702026

Filing Number

2681/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

433/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

16

Police Station

GARDANI BAGH

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 21,22(B),25,29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sanoj Yadav

    Adv. PRINCE KHATRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

    The Special Judge (NDPS) Patna rejected Sanoj Yadav's regular bail application in an NDPS drug trafficking case. The court found that 28 grams of smack recovered from co-accused persons exceeded the "small quantity" threshold, and that co-accused persons disclosed Yadav as their supplier, warranting continued custody pending investigation and charge sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 433/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge (NDPS) Patna rejected Sanoj Yadav's regular bail application in an NDPS drug trafficking case. The court found that 28 grams of smack recovered from co-accused persons exceeded the "small quantity" threshold, and that co-accused persons disclosed Yadav as their supplier, warranting continued custody pending investigation and charge sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case