Ajit Kumar Gupta vs State of Bihar — 431/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8,17(c),18(c),25,29,31,61. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail - BP

CNR: BRPA010030672026

Filing Number

2678/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

431/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

364

Police Station

Gopalpur

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8,17(c),18(c),25,29,31,61

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ajit Kumar Gupta

    Adv. Ajay Kumar 9

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Special Judge (NDPS) Court in Patna rejected the bail application of Ajit Kumar Gupta, who was arrested in connection with the recovery of 43 kg of opium under various sections of the NDPS Act. The court determined that the recovered quantity constitutes a commercial quantity under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, and considering the serious nature of the allegations, ongoing investigation, and pending chargesheet, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 431/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge (NDPS) Court in Patna rejected the bail application of Ajit Kumar Gupta, who was arrested in connection with the recovery of 43 kg of opium under various sections of the NDPS Act. The court determined that the recovered quantity constitutes a commercial quantity under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, and considering the serious nature of the allegations, ongoing investigation, and pending chargesheet, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case