Md. Rahim vs State of Bihar — 427/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 111. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail - BP

CNR: BRPA010030632026

Filing Number

2674/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

427/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

58

Police Station

MAL SALAMI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 111
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 21(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Md. Rahim

    Adv. MD ILYAS ANSARY

  2. 2.Md. Sagir

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Special Judge (NDPS), Patna rejected the bail application of Md. Rahim and Md. Sagir, who were arrested for smuggling approximately 4,885 liters of contraband cough syrup under NDPS Act Section 21(c), with Sagir identified as the supplier. The court found the allegations serious, the quantity fell within commercial limits, investigation was ongoing, and chargesheet was pending, making it unfit to grant regular bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 427/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge (NDPS), Patna rejected the bail application of Md. Rahim and Md. Sagir, who were arrested for smuggling approximately 4,885 liters of contraband cough syrup under NDPS Act Section 21(c), with Sagir identified as the supplier. The court found the allegations serious, the quantity fell within commercial limits, investigation was ongoing, and chargesheet was pending, making it unfit to grant regular bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case