Kamlesh Kumar alisa Bhola Kumar vs State of Bihar — 421/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 111(2)(b). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail - BP

CNR: BRPA010030542026

Filing Number

2665/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

421/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

74

Police Station

PARSHA BAZAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 111(2)(b)
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 21(b),8(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kamlesh Kumar alisa Bhola Kumar

    Adv. KUMARI BINDU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Special Judge (NDPS) Patna rejected the regular bail application of Kamlesh Kumar, who was arrested for selling smack and injections with 2.10 grams of smack recovered from his possession under NDPS Act Sections 8(c) and 21(b). The court held that although the recovered quantity was small, the non-bailable nature of Section 111(2)(b) BNS, the serious nature of the offense, the petitioner's prior criminal antecedent, and ongoing investigation warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 421/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Judge (NDPS) Patna rejected the regular bail application of Kamlesh Kumar, who was arrested for selling smack and injections with 2.10 grams of smack recovered from his possession under NDPS Act Sections 8(c) and 21(b). The court held that although the recovered quantity was small, the non-bailable nature of Section 111(2)(b) BNS, the serious nature of the offense, the petitioner's prior criminal antecedent, and ongoing investigation warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case