Raju Kumar vs State of Bihar — 586/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 21,22(a),29. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail - ABP
CNR: BRPA010027982026
Filing Number
2444/2026
Filing Date
07-Feb-2026
Registration No
586/2026
Registration Date
07-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Patna Sadar
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
06
Police Station
SACHIVALAYA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Raju Kumar
Adv. Roushan Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of Order
The Special Judge (NDPS), Patna rejected Raju Kumar's anticipatory bail application in a case involving recovery of 299 ampoules of narcotic injections (Buprenorphine and Pheniramine Maleate) from his vehicle under NDPS Act sections 21/22(a)(b)/29. The court found the nature and quantum of recovery serious, the investigation ongoing, and the chargesheet pending, rendering it unfit for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 586/2026
The Special Judge (NDPS), Patna rejected Raju Kumar's anticipatory bail application in a case involving recovery of 299 ampoules of narcotic injections (Buprenorphine and Pheniramine Maleate) from his vehicle under NDPS Act sections 21/22(a)(b)/29. The court found the nature and quantum of recovery serious, the investigation ongoing, and the chargesheet pending, rendering it unfit for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts