Gaurav Prakash vs State of Bihar — 539/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),316(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail - ABP

CNR: BRPA010026132026

Filing Number

2284/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

539/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

5-Dasj XXI

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

309

Police Station

PIRBAHORE

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),316(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gaurav Prakash

    Adv. ANJALI PRAKASH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Patna, rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Gaurav Prakash in a fraud case involving Rs. 25 lakhs received through RTGS for a promised medicine franchise that was never delivered. The court found prima facie evidence of dishonest intention and culpable conduct by the company directors, including cessation of communication and non-response to legal notice, making the petitioner unsuitable for anticipatory bail despite arguments that the matter was primarily a civil dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Dasj XXI

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj XXI

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj XXI

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj XXI

  7. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj XXI

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj XXI

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj XXI

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  11. 13-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj XXI

  12. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj XXI

  13. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj XXI

  14. 10-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj XXI

  15. 09-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj XXI

  16. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 539/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Patna, rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Gaurav Prakash in a fraud case involving Rs. 25 lakhs received through RTGS for a promised medicine franchise that was never delivered. The court found prima facie evidence of dishonest intention and culpable conduct by the company directors, including cessation of communication and non-response to legal notice, making the petitioner unsuitable for anticipatory bail despite arguments that the matter was primarily a civil dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case