Gaurav Prakash vs State of Bihar — 539/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),316(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail - ABP

CNR: BRPA010026132026

Case disposed

Filing Number

2284/2026

Filing Date

05-02-2026

Registration No

539/2026

Registration Date

05-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

5-DASJ XXI

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

309

Police Station

PIRBAHORE

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),316(2)

Petitioner(s)

Gaurav Prakash

Adv. ANJALI PRAKASH

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 5-DASJ XXI

24-03-2026

Disposed

19-03-2026

HEARING

17-03-2026

HEARING

12-03-2026

HEARING

28-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Patna, rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Gaurav Prakash in a fraud case involving Rs. 25 lakhs received through RTGS for a promised medicine franchise that was never delivered. The court found prima facie evidence of dishonest intention and culpable conduct by the company directors, including cessation of communication and non-response to legal notice, making the petitioner unsuitable for anticipatory bail despite arguments that the matter was primarily a civil dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

13-02-2026
Copy of Order
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Patna, rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Gaurav Prakash in a fraud case involving Rs. 25 lakhs received through RTGS for a promised medicine franchise that was never delivered. The court found prima facie evidence of dishonest intention and culpable conduct by the company directors, including cessation of communication and non-response to legal notice, making the petitioner unsuitable for anticipatory bail despite arguments that the matter was primarily a civil dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case