Dr.Sabiha Ahmed vs State of Bihar — 32/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Miscellaneous - Criminal Miscellaneous

CNR: BRPA010023172026

Filing Number

2032/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

32/2026

Registration Date

31-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dr.Sabiha Ahmed

    Adv. Sunil Kumar 12

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

  2. 2.Ataur Rahman

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Copy of Order

    The Sessions Judge dismissed Dr. Sabiha Ahmed's transfer petition in her domestic violence case, finding no merit in her allegations that the ACJM-VII judge was biased or influenced by the opposite party. The court accepted the ACJM's report, which denied all accusations and confirmed that all orders were passed on merit after hearing both parties, characterizing the transfer request as a pressure tactic to secure a favorable outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Admission

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing On Admission

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing On Admission

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Copy of Order

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 32/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge dismissed Dr. Sabiha Ahmed's transfer petition in her domestic violence case, finding no merit in her allegations that the ACJM-VII judge was biased or influenced by the opposite party. The court accepted the ACJM's report, which denied all accusations and confirmed that all orders were passed on merit after hearing both parties, characterizing the transfer request as a pressure tactic to secure a favorable outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case