Rajeev Kumar vs State of Bihar — 7/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th March 2026.
Cr. Miscellaneous - Criminal Miscellaneous
CNR: BRPA010008852026
Filing Number
786/2026
Filing Date
13-Jan-2026
Registration No
7/2026
Registration Date
13-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Patna Sadar
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajeev Kumar
Adv. Anil kumar 5
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
-
2.Shambhu Prasad
-
3.Hari Narayan Prasad Guata
-
4.Vijay Kumar Gupta
-
5.Sachin Kumar
-
6.Santosh Kumar Gupta
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
Copy of Order
The Sessions Judge dismissed petitioner Rajeev Kumar's application to transfer a 23-year-old complaint case from ACJM-VII Patna to another court, finding insufficient grounds for transfer. The court rejected the petitioner's claim that the judge showed bias by inclining toward discharge of accused persons, characterizing it as a baseless tactic to delay proceedings, noting the case had stalled for eight years on a discharge petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing On Admission
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing On Admission
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Hearing On Admission
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 7/2026
The Sessions Judge dismissed petitioner Rajeev Kumar's application to transfer a 23-year-old complaint case from ACJM-VII Patna to another court, finding insufficient grounds for transfer. The court rejected the petitioner's claim that the judge showed bias by inclining toward discharge of accused persons, characterizing it as a baseless tactic to delay proceedings, noting the case had stalled for eight years on a discharge petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts