SATYENDRA PRASAD SINGH vs AJIT KUMAR — 609/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,149,341,323,427,379,504,506,308. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th April 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRNW010095012024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
9472/2024
Filing Date
16-05-2020
Registration No
609/2024
Registration Date
16-05-2020
Court
DJ Div. Nawada
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
160
Police Station
MEKSAUR
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SATYENDRA PRASAD SINGH
Respondent(s)
AJIT KUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 01-04-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. | |
| 25-03-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. | |
| 18-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted all 11 accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 308/149, 323/149, 427/149, and 504/149, finding that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted the key witness (informant) made critical admissions during cross-examination—that he did not witness the assault, lodged the case based on hearsay from co-villagers, and the matter was later amicably settled as a property partition dispute, significantly undermining the prosecution's credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted all 11 accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 308/149, 323/149, 427/149, and 504/149, finding that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted the key witness (informant) made critical admissions during cross-examination—that he did not witness the assault, lodged the case based on hearsay from co-villagers, and the matter was later amicably settled as a property partition dispute, significantly undermining the prosecution's credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts