KISHORI CHAUHAN vs STATE OF BIHAR — 639/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),117(2),126(2),109,351(3),190,191(3). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

ABP

CNR: BRNW010016622026

Filing Number

1498/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

639/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Nawada

Judge

16-11th Dasj

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

501

Police Station

PAKRIBARAWAN

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),117(2),126(2),109,351(3),190,191(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KISHORI CHAUHAN

    Adv. SUNIL KUMAR SINHA

  2. 2.KAMLESH CHAUHAN

  3. 3.CHANDAN CHAUHAN URF CHANDAN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Kisauri Chouhan, Kamlesh Chouhan, and Chandan Chouhan (Case No. 639/2026) arising from FIR No. 501/2025 under sections 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 109, 351(3), 352, 190, and 191(3) BNS. The court found direct evidence of assault against the applicants through injury reports and eyewitness testimony, and noted that the applicants' family had previously filed a civil suit (No. 602/2024) regarding the disputed land, indicating mala fide conduct and disrespect for law enforcement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    11th Dasj

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    11th Dasj

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    11th Dasj

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 639/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Kisauri Chouhan, Kamlesh Chouhan, and Chandan Chouhan (Case No. 639/2026) arising from FIR No. 501/2025 under sections 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 109, 351(3), 352, 190, and 191(3) BNS. The court found direct evidence of assault against the applicants through injury reports and eyewitness testimony, and noted that the applicants' family had previously filed a civil suit (No. 602/2024) regarding the disputed land, indicating mala fide conduct and disrespect for law enforcement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case